National exam becomes the hot topic in most of discussions. Though the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by the go-vernment on the organization of the national exams, the controversy over whether it is necessary to maintain the national exams (UN) has continued. Some debates include the primary questions such as; does the quality of Indonesia education depend on the national exam?, will the quality of the Indonesian education system worsen without natipnal exam?

People, who support the national exam explain that the quality of the Indonesia education system will drop without the national exam, so they try to defend the current system.



However there are people who disagree with the opinion. Those who against this national exam kept in our high school education say that it doesn't need the national exams because the quality of education does not just depend on the national exam. Further, the national exam only measures a small portion of students' competence in specific subjects, and does not measure students' competences throughout the semester.

In fact, the national examination can still be useful as an instrument to evaluate or detect the level of students' cognitive competence in several subjects, on a national scale.

1 komentar:

national exam is one of the requirements for graduate school. but in practice many have failed. such as the leaking of the national exam prior to implementation, exchange of the answer via sms, or even perhaps because supervisors allow cheating. it makes the most of the students in Indonesia to lose confidence in doing exam. I think the government should improve the national examination system, and it does not have to remove the national exam as one determinant of graduation.

Posting Komentar

"a glow in the dark"

About this blog

Pengikut

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.